Thursday, August 4, 2011

Do you think treyarch should be aloud to make another COD game?

I think that treyarch just put out a crappy COD game to get $. It was nice that they made camping harder but maybe they took it a little to far with the spawning? Quick scoping and noob toobing was taken out thankfully. In MW2 one man army is a *#%~ joke. My K/D in both games are 1.2- BO is a different playing style but honestly when it comes down to it all the weapons are the same. Minus accuracy and rate of fire. Other than that same damage. I know "but the little bars say that this gun does more damage". It doesn't. "the rate of fire is this" and it isn't. When the program is hacked and number are rendered for amounts it's sad. Most of the stats are off. I like MW2 better. I like the M16 and famas. if the M16 did the damage that it said it does in the game it would be a 2-3 bullet kill to the chest. The famas would be a 3-4 bullet kill. The second number is for far distance the first is for close. The FAL is a 2-3. And B/C of a glitch with the holographic site it's a 2. Like a sniper rifle. It's really sad that it's the same way for BO. I hope they fix it for MW3 if they make it. But all in all. Treyarch... screwed up COD BO with the bad graphics and crappy guns... And crappy perks. Can't call more than one air support in at once. Its takes 2 head shots o kill someone... Should they be aloud to make another COD? What would you like to see that's different in the next one? Thank you for your time. :)

0 comments:

Post a Comment